Menu

Strategy

Fake Door Testing

A practical product validation method for measuring demand with real user behaviour before committing engineering effort.

How to use fake door testing to validate demand for unbuilt ideas, prioritise what to build, and reduce product risk through real behavioural signals.

4 min read

What it is

Fake door testing is a UX method used to measure real user interest in a , product, or before it exists.

Users are presented with something that looks real, such as a button, link, or , but when they interact with it, they are informed that the is not yet available.

The is tracked to understand demand and .

It is often used on live products to validate ideas using real rather than assumptions.

The focus is on what users do, not what they say.

The goal is to determine whether something is worth building.

Fake door testing is most useful when the key question is demand, and you need behaviour evidence before building.

When to use it

Use this method when you need to validate demand.

It is most useful when:

You are considering a new feature or product
You want real behavioural data
You need to prioritise what to build
You want to reduce development risk
You have access to live traffic

It is less useful when:

misleading users could damage trust
the feature is already committed
you cannot track interactions properly
Fake door testing is often used in product discovery and validation.

Key takeaway

Use fake door testing when you need real demand signals to decide if an idea deserves build investment.

How to run it

Set up properly

Be clear on the you are testing, where the entry point appears, and how are tracked. Placement determines the result as much as the idea does.

Decide what people see after clicking, and make it respectful. A fake door that wastes somebody's time without explanation damages for a point.

Run the method

Fake door testing measures demand for something that does not exist yet, by putting a realistic entry point in front of real users. It is cheap, fast, and ethically finely balanced.

  1. Create an entry point that looks genuine and describes the honestly.
  2. Place it where somebody would plausibly look for that , rather than where it will attract the most clicks.
  3. Track , distinguishing deliberate clicks from exploratory ones by looking at what people did next.
  4. Show a clear message explaining the is not available yet, apologise for it, and mean it.
  5. Optionally capture interest through a sign-up, which is a much stronger demand signal than a click.

Keep it brief and keep it honest. Fake doors are best run for a short window and taken down; leaving one indefinitely is a decision to mislead.

Capture and make sense of it

The value comes from measuring cheaply. After the test, document:

  • Click-through against a realistic expectation, set in advance
  • How many went further and left contact details
  • Where the interest came from, by segment
  • Whether demand justifies building, including when it does not

Use this to avoid building unwanted things. Treat a negative result as the successful outcome it is.

What to look for

Focus on:

Interest: how many users interact
Intent: where and how users engage
Context: when users try to access it
Demand: whether there is enough value
Follow-up: sign-ups or expressions of interest

Where it goes wrong

Most issues come from:

If is broken, it can backfire.

Leaving it running indefinitely, which turns a test into a deception
Placing it where it attracts clicks rather than where the need is
Counting curiosity clicks as demand
Dismissing people with no explanation or apology
Reading a positive result as a mandate rather than as a signal

What you get from it

Done properly, this method gives you:

Demand measured before anything is built
Sign-ups, which are a far stronger signal than a click
Where the interest came from, by segment
A negative result, which is the cheapest good news available

Key takeaway

It helps you build what people actually want.

Get in touch

If this sounds like something you need, we can help you validate demand using fake door testing so you build the right things at the right time.

No guesswork. No assumptions. Just real signals from real users.

FAQ

Common questions

A few practical answers to the questions that usually come up around this method.

What is fake door testing in UX?

It is a method for measuring interest in a feature before it exists.

When should you use fake door testing?

Use it when validating demand for new ideas.

Is it deceptive?

It can be if handled poorly, so transparency after interaction is important.

What can you measure?

Clicks, engagement, and expressions of interest.

Does fake door testing improve UX?

Yes. It helps ensure you prioritise features users actually want.

Quick take

If you want to know if people want something before building it, put a door there and see who tries to open it.

LET'S WORK TOGETHER

Ready to improve your product?

UX, research and product leadership for teams tackling complex digital services.

Previous feedback

I had a fantastic experience working with Andy. One of his most impressive achievements during our time at NHS HEE was masterminding a deeply complex information architecture for a new platform that brought together a large number of legacy websites.

Will Parkhouse

Senior Content Designer