Desktop audits missed mobile barriers
Your product passed a desktop review, but mobile users still struggle.
Review accessibility on real mobile devices: touch targets, gestures, screen reader behaviour, orientation and zoom, where desktop audits miss problems.
Fixed Price
£1,995 + VATor PAYG
Need something different? Larger or more complex projects are usually better suited to a bespoke engagement.
How do I know if my project is the right fit? ↓Most accessibility audits are run on a desktop. Most of your users are on a phone.
A Mobile Accessibility Review provides an independent assessment of how accessible your website or mobile app is on real mobile devices, not emulators or a resized desktop browser.
The review covers the barriers desktop audits miss: touch target size, gesture alternatives, mobile screen reader behaviour, orientation, zoom and reflow.
You’ll leave with prioritised recommendations that make your product genuinely usable on the devices people actually use.
Your product passed a desktop review, but mobile users still struggle.
Small targets and gesture-only interactions exclude people with motor or dexterity needs.
VoiceOver and TalkBack surface issues desktop testing never finds.
Content fails when users zoom, enlarge text or rotate their device.
The barriers that exclude mobile users rarely show up in a desktop browser.
Mobile accessibility has its own failure modes: touch targets, gestures, screen reader focus order, orientation lock and text scaling. They need to be tested on real devices to be found.
I combine accessibility, UX and mobile experience review to identify barriers, explain their impact and prioritise improvements that make your product easier for everyone to use on a phone.
You’ll leave with practical recommendations rather than just a compliance checklist.
You need to understand where barriers exist for mobile users.
Your audits are desktop-based but your users aren’t.
Mobile-specific criteria in recognised guidance need assessing before risk increases.
Review accessibility before further design or development spend.
A focused discussion to understand your product, users, key journeys and accessibility concerns.
Independent review of one website or mobile app on real iOS and Android devices.
Touch targets, gestures, screen reader behaviour, orientation, zoom and reflow assessed against recognised guidance.
Clear improvements ranked by impact, severity and implementation effort.
A collaborative walkthrough of findings and recommended accessibility improvements.
A concise document supporting accessibility improvement or development planning.
A structured review of mobile accessibility barriers with findings and recommendations.
Issues across touch, gesture, screen reader, orientation and zoom, mapped to recognised guidance where relevant.
Practical improvements explaining what should change and why.
Next steps ready for accessibility improvement or development planning.
Week 1
Kick-off, journey review and accessibility assessment on real devices.
Week 2
Playback, recommendations and next steps.
Testing takes place on real iOS and Android devices, including their built-in screen readers (VoiceOver and TalkBack), rather than emulators or resized desktop browsers.
Yes. The review can cover a mobile website, a responsive site or a native iOS or Android app. Each engagement focuses on one product.
Yes. An Accessibility Review assesses a product broadly across desktop and mobile. A Mobile Accessibility Review goes deeper on mobile specifically, testing on real devices for the barriers desktop audits miss.
You’ll receive prioritised recommendations explaining which mobile accessibility improvements should happen first and why.
I’m based in Manchester, UK and work with organisations across the UK, Europe and internationally. Most projects are delivered remotely, although I’m happy to travel for workshops, stakeholder sessions and key project milestones where required.
Yes. Most projects are delivered remotely using Microsoft Teams, Google Meet or Zoom. Working remotely allows me to support organisations across the UK and internationally while remaining flexible and cost-effective.
Yes. Every project is delivered by me. If additional specialist support is ever needed, I’ll discuss it with you first, but you’ll always work directly with me throughout the project.
Absolutely. Many clients already have designers, researchers, developers or product managers in place. I can provide additional capacity, independent advice or senior support without disrupting the way your team already works.
No. I’ve worked with startups, SMEs, agencies, charities, public sector organisations and global enterprises. Every engagement is tailored to the size, complexity and goals of the organisation.
The fixed engagements are designed around the most common types of engagement. If your project requires something different, I’ll create a bespoke proposal based on your goals, timescales and scope.
Availability varies throughout the year, but many fixed engagements can begin within one to two weeks. If you have an urgent requirement, let me know and I’ll always do my best to accommodate it.
Yes. Much of my work has involved commercially sensitive products, government services and confidential research. I’m happy to sign NDAs and regularly work with organisations where confidentiality is essential.
LET'S WORK TOGETHER
UX, research and product leadership for teams tackling complex digital services.
Previous feedback
I had a fantastic experience working with Andy. One of his most impressive achievements during our time at NHS HEE was masterminding a deeply complex information architecture for a new platform that brought together a large number of legacy websites.
Will Parkhouse
Senior Content Designer
If you’re looking for review accessibility on real mobile devices: touch targets, gestures, screen reader behaviour, orientation and zoom, where desktop audits miss problems, let’s discuss whether Mobile Accessibility Review is the right place to start.