Accessibility

Accessibility Audit

A practical UX method for assessing accessibility barriers across interfaces, content, and interactions against recognised standards.

How to run an accessibility audit to identify barriers, prioritise fixes, and improve usability and compliance.

09 October 20134 min read

Quick take

If some users can’t use your product, it’s broken. An accessibility audit shows you where and why.

What it is

An audit is a UX method used to evaluate how well a product meets standards and supports users with a wide range of needs.

It involves reviewing , , and content against recognised guidelines such as .

The audit looks at areas like keyboard , compatibility, colour contrast, structure, and .

It combines automated tools with manual review to identify issues that affect and compliance.

The focus is on making the product usable for everyone, not just meeting minimum standards.

The goal is to identify barriers and define what needs to be fixed.

Accessibility audits are most valuable when they improve real user outcomes, not just compliance checklists.

When to use it

Use this method when inclusivity and compliance matter.

It is most useful when:

you are launching or updating a product
you need to meet accessibility standards
you want to improve usability for all users
you are working in regulated sectors
you have received accessibility complaints or feedback

It is less useful when:

the product is still in very early concept stages
there is no intention to act on findings
Accessibility audits are often used before release and during optimisation.

Key takeaway

Run accessibility audits when delivery decisions can still be changed and fixed.

How to run it

Set up properly.

Before you start, be clear on the scope of the audit, the standards you are measuring against, and the tools and methods to use.

Ensure you cover real user scenarios.

Run the method.

audits are systematic and detailed.

Review against guidelines. Test keyboard and focus states. Check screen reader behaviour. Assess colour contrast and readability. Use automated tools to identify issues. Manually validate findings.

Focus on real , not just compliance.

Capture and make sense of it.

The value comes from clear, actionable .

After the audit: document issues and their severity, explain impact on users, prioritise fixes, and provide recommendations.

Use this to improve and compliance.

What to look for

Focus on:

Navigation
Can users move through the product easily
Perception
Can content be seen, heard, or understood
Interaction
Can users interact without barriers
Structure
Is content organised and readable
Compliance
Does it meet required standards

Where it goes wrong

Most issues come from:

If it’s only about compliance, you miss the point.

relying only on automated tools
treating it as a checklist exercise
not understanding real user needs
ignoring findings
fixing symptoms instead of root causes

What you get from it

Done properly, this method gives you:

a clear view of accessibility issues
prioritised fixes
improved usability for all users
reduced legal and reputational risk

Key takeaway

It helps you create a product everyone can use.

Get in touch

If this sounds like something you need, we can run a full audit and help you fix the issues that are holding users back.

No guesswork. No assumptions. Just that works for everyone.

FAQ

Common questions

A few practical answers to the questions that usually come up around this method.

What is an accessibility audit in UX?

It is a method for evaluating how accessible a product is for all users.

When should you run an accessibility audit?

Before launch and during .

What standards are used?

Typically guidelines.

Are automated tools enough?

No. Manual testing is essential.

Does an accessibility audit improve UX?

Yes. It removes barriers and improves for everyone.

LET'S WORK TOGETHER

Ready to improve your product?

UX, research and product leadership for teams tackling complex digital services. The work usually starts where things have become harder than they need to be: unclear journeys, inconsistent products, competing priorities, or teams trying to move forward without a clear direction. I help simplify the problem, shape the right next step, and turn complexity into something people can actually use.

Previous feedback

Will Parkhouse

Senior Content Designer

01/20