Menu

Content

Cloze Testing

A practical UX and content method for testing comprehension by asking users to complete structured missing-word content.

How to run cloze testing to identify confusing language and improve readability, clarity, and task support.

4 min read

What it is

Cloze testing is a UX and content method used to evaluate and by systematically removing words from a text and asking users to fill in the blanks.

It helps identify which parts of content are confusing, unclear, or poorly structured.

This method is often applied to instructional content, help articles, product descriptions, or any text that requires understanding to complete tasks.

The focus is on rather than grammar or style.

The goal is to ensure users can understand and act on your content as intended.

Cloze testing reveals where users genuinely understand content versus where they are only skimming.

When to use it

Use this method when you need to test content .

It is most useful when:

content is instructional or complex
you are refining copy for clarity
you want objective measures of understanding
you are preparing content for a wide audience
comprehension is critical for task completion

It is less useful when:

content is very short or simple
tasks do not rely on text comprehension
Cloze testing is often used alongside readability testing and plain language reviews.

Key takeaway

Use cloze testing when language clarity directly affects user success.

How to run it

Set up properly

Be clear on the content you are testing, which words you will remove and on what rule, and who the participants are. Removing words by judgement rather than by rule turns the test into a quiz you wrote the answers to.

Choose representative content and realistic scenarios. A cloze test on your best-written page tells you very little.

Run the method

Cloze testing is structured and task-based. By removing words at intervals and asking people to restore them, it measures whether the surrounding text carries enough meaning to predict what is missing.

  1. Remove words systematically (every fifth or sixth word is the usual convention) rather than choosing which to delete.
  2. Present the modified content to people who have not seen the original.
  3. Ask them to fill each blank with whatever word they think belongs.
  4. Observe errors, hesitation and misinterpretation as they work, not only the final answers.
  5. Record and analyse the , treating near-synonyms as correct. You are testing , not vocabulary matching.

Focus on rather than recall. A low score means the passage failed to establish its own , not that the reader was inattentive.

Capture and make sense of it

The value comes from identifying unclear content. After testing, document:

  • The words and sections people could not reconstruct
  • of misunderstanding across participants
  • Revisions prioritised by where the passage carries real consequence
  • A follow-up test, since a rewrite is a

Use this to make content more understandable. It is an unusually objective test of prose, which makes it useful in arguments about writing.

What to look for

Focus on:

Comprehension: are users able to fill in the blanks correctly
Confusion points: sections where users make errors
Readability: which phrases or structures are difficult
Consistency: is language predictable and clear
Impact: how errors affect task completion

Where it goes wrong

Most issues come from:

If the blanks are too obvious or too hard, the results are invalid.

Choosing which words to remove, which turns the test into a quiz you wrote
Removing so much that the passage is unreadable rather than merely gapped
Testing people who already know the content
Marking near-synonyms wrong, when comprehension rather than vocabulary is the point
Rewriting on the result without testing the rewrite

What you get from it

Done properly, this method gives you:

An objective measure of whether a passage carries its own context
The specific sections readers could not reconstruct
Evidence in an argument about writing that is usually settled by seniority
A repeatable check you can run again after the rewrite

Key takeaway

It helps ensure users understand content and can act on it correctly.

Get in touch

If this sounds like something you need, we can run cloze testing on your content to identify gaps in comprehension and make your product easier to understand.

No guesswork. No assumptions. Just content that works for real users.

FAQ

Common questions

A few practical answers to the questions that usually come up around this method.

What is cloze testing in UX?

It is a method for measuring comprehension by having users fill in missing words in content.

When should you use cloze testing?

During content audits, readability testing, or copy refinement.

What can you test?

Instructional text, help articles, product copy, and messaging.

What does cloze testing catch that a read-through misses?

It identifies sections users do not understand and prevents confusion.

Does cloze testing improve UX?

Yes. It ensures content is clear, understandable, and actionable.

Quick take

If you want to know whether users really understand your content, remove some words and test comprehension.

LET'S WORK TOGETHER

Ready to improve your product?

UX, research and product leadership for teams tackling complex digital services.

Previous feedback

I had a fantastic experience working with Andy. One of his most impressive achievements during our time at NHS HEE was masterminding a deeply complex information architecture for a new platform that brought together a large number of legacy websites.

Will Parkhouse

Senior Content Designer