UX

The difference between fixing UX and fixing the product

Not everything that looks like a UX problem is one. Some problems go deeper.

Why some problems are not about refining the experience, but changing what has been built underneath it.

22 December 20256 min read

In short

Why some problems are not about refining the experience, but changing what has been built underneath it.

Not every problem is a UX problem

Some are product problems. I've been brought into projects where the brief was to improve the experience, but within a short time it became clear that the issue wasn't how things were presented — it was what was being presented.

In one case, users were abandoning a journey halfway through. The assumption was that the flow was confusing or the needed simplifying. When we looked closer, users weren't dropping off because they were lost. They were dropping off because what they were being offered didn't feel right at that point in the journey. No amount of UX fixes that.

Fixing UX improves how something works. Fixing the product questions whether it should work that way at all.

The difference between improving and rethinking

Fixing UX is about improving how something works. Fixing the product is about questioning whether it should work that way at all. You can refine a journey so it's easier to follow, make decisions clearer, and reduce between steps. All of that improves the experience. But if the underlying proposition is off, those improvements only go so far. You're making something smoother, not necessarily better.

Key takeaway

If the product is wrong, refining the UX only makes the wrong thing easier to get through.

Where this shows up most clearly

In eCommerce, it often surfaces as users hesitating at the point of purchase. The instinct is to optimise the checkout, reduce steps, improve . Sometimes that helps. But when the issue is pricing , expectations, or product information, the friction isn't coming from the UX layer. It's coming from the product itself.

In more complex , it can be even more pronounced. Journeys are designed around how the organisation works, rather than what the user needs. UX can make those journeys easier to navigate, but it can't remove the mismatch between the product and the user's expectations.

What happens when everything gets treated as a UX problem

You end up constantly refining the without ever addressing the . The experience improves incrementally, but the core issue remains, and users continue to feel it. Over time, that to a lot of effort with limited impact.

Where the real value sits

The shift happens when you're willing to step back. To look at the journey and ask whether it's structured in the right way. Whether the product is solving the right problem at the right point. Whether the user is being asked to do something that could be handled differently.

That's not always a comfortable conversation, because it often challenges decisions that have already been made. But it's where the real value is. The most effective work comes from being able to move between both: improving the experience within existing , but also recognising when the problem sits deeper and needs a different approach.

Sometimes it's about refining. Sometimes it's about rethinking. Knowing the difference is what stops you spending time fixing the wrong thing.

Written by Andy Scott

Strategic design, UX and digital transformation thinking from real projects.

LET'S WORK TOGETHER

Ready to improve your product?

UX, research and product leadership for teams tackling complex digital services. The work usually starts where things have become harder than they need to be: unclear journeys, inconsistent products, competing priorities, or teams trying to move forward without a clear direction. I help simplify the problem, shape the right next step, and turn complexity into something people can actually use.

Previous feedback

Will Parkhouse

Senior Content Designer

01/20