Menu

UX

The difference between fixing UX and fixing the product

Not everything that looks like a UX problem is one. Some problems go deeper.

Why some problems are not about refining the experience, but changing what has been built underneath it.

22 December 20254 min read

In short

Why some problems are not about refining the experience, but changing what has been built underneath it.

Not every problem is a UX problem

Some are product problems. I've been brought into projects where the brief was to improve the experience, but within a short time it became clear that the issue wasn't how things were presented. It was what was being presented.

In one case, users were abandoning a journey halfway through. The assumption was that the flow was confusing or the needed simplifying. When we looked closer, users weren't dropping off because they were lost. They were dropping off because what they were being offered didn't feel right at that point in the journey. No amount of UX fixes that.

Fixing UX improves how something works. Fixing the product questions whether it should work that way at all.

The difference between improving and rethinking

Fixing UX is about improving how something works. Fixing the product is about questioning whether it should work that way at all. You can refine a journey so it's easier to follow, make decisions clearer, and reduce between steps. All of that improves the experience. But if the underlying proposition is off, those improvements only go so far. You're making something smoother, not necessarily better.

There is a rough way to tell which one you are looking at. If you fixed every issue on the list, would the numbers move enough to matter? When the honest answer is no, the problem is not in how the thing is presented, and more will keep confirming that expensively.

Key takeaway

If the product is wrong, refining the UX only makes the wrong thing easier to get through.

Where this shows up most clearly

In eCommerce, it often surfaces as users hesitating at the point of purchase. The instinct is to optimise the checkout, reduce steps, improve . Sometimes that helps. But when the issue is pricing , expectations, or product information, the friction isn't coming from the UX layer. It's coming from the product itself.

In more complex , it can be even more pronounced. Journeys are designed around how the organisation works, rather than what the user needs. UX can make those journeys easier to navigate, but it can't remove the mismatch between the product and the user's expectations.

The is usually visible in where people leave. spread evenly across a journey tends to be , and friction is a UX problem. Drop-off concentrated at one point, immediately after a specific piece of information appears, is usually the product, and it is telling you something about the offer rather than the interface.

What happens when everything gets treated as a UX problem

You end up constantly refining the without ever addressing the . The experience improves incrementally, but the core issue remains, and users continue to feel it. Over time, that to a lot of effort with limited impact.

It also quietly damages the of design work. After a few rounds of improvements that did not move anything, the organisation concludes that UX does not deliver, when what actually happened is that UX was asked to solve something outside its reach.

The framing usually comes from how the work was commissioned. A brief that arrives as improve the checkout has already decided the checkout is the problem. A brief that arrives as work out why people are not buying leaves room for the answer to be somewhere else.

Where the real value sits

The shift happens when you're willing to step back. To look at the journey and ask whether it's structured in the right way. Whether the product is solving the right problem at the right point. Whether the user is being asked to do something that could be handled differently.

That's not always a comfortable conversation, because it often challenges decisions that have already been made. But it's where the real value is. The most effective work comes from being able to move between both: improving the experience within existing , but also recognising when the problem sits deeper and needs a different approach.

Sometimes it's about refining. Sometimes it's about rethinking. Knowing the difference is what stops you spending time fixing the wrong thing.

Raising it well matters as much as spotting it. Arriving with the problems solved, and the evidence that solving them changes little, is a very different conversation from opening with the proposition being wrong. The first is a finding. The second sounds like an opinion about somebody else's decision.

Written by Andy Scott

Strategic design, UX and digital transformation thinking from real projects.

LET'S WORK TOGETHER

Ready to improve your product?

UX, research and product leadership for teams tackling complex digital services.

Previous feedback

I had a fantastic experience working with Andy. One of his most impressive achievements during our time at NHS HEE was masterminding a deeply complex information architecture for a new platform that brought together a large number of legacy websites.

Will Parkhouse

Senior Content Designer