Research

The difference between listening to users and understanding them

It’s easy to listen to users. It’s much harder to understand them.

Why research becomes more valuable when it goes beyond what users say and starts interpreting what they actually do.

13 June 20255 min read

In short

Why research becomes more valuable when it goes beyond what users say and starts interpreting what they actually do.

Why listening is only the start

But what people say and what they actually do are often two very different things.

I’ve been in where users confidently explain how they would behave, only to do something completely different a few minutes later.

They say they’d read everything before making a decision, then skip half the content.

They say they want more options, then hesitate when presented with them.

They say something is clear, then struggle when they try to use it.

None of that is intentional. It’s just how people are.

What people say and what they actually do are often two very different things.

Where listening starts to fall short

That’s where listening on its own starts to fall short.

If you take everything at face value, you end up designing for what users say they want, not what actually helps them.

I’ve seen this play out on projects where was taken too literally.

In one case, users repeatedly asked for more information earlier in the . The instinct was to surface more content upfront. On paper, that aligned perfectly with what had been said. In practice, it made the experience heavier and harder to move through.

What users were really asking for wasn’t more information, it was more .

That’s a different problem.

Key takeaway

Users often describe the symptom they feel, not the actual cause behind it.

Where understanding begins

Understanding comes from looking beyond the words.

It’s about how people behave, where they hesitate, what they ignore, and what they expect to happen next. It’s about spotting the gaps between what’s said and what’s done, and working out what’s actually driving that .

I’ve found that some of the most useful come from those gaps.

A user saying something is fine, but taking longer than expected to complete it.

A moment where they pause, not because something is unclear, but because it doesn’t feel right.

A where they second guess themselves, even though they’ve been given all the information they need.

Those moments rarely show up in a summary, but they’re often where the real issues sit.

Why interpretation matters

This is where becomes more than just collecting .

It becomes interpretation.

Understanding , intent, and , not just .

I’ve seen teams lean heavily on quotes as proof of .

A strong quote feels compelling. It’s easy to share, easy to present, and easy to align around. But on its own, it can be misleading. Without , it’s just a snapshot of what someone said in a moment, not necessarily a reflection of what’s actually happening.

Where insight actually forms

The real value comes from connecting things together.

What users say.

What they do.

What they expect.

Where those things don’t align.

That’s where understanding starts to form.

In my experience, the difference between listening and understanding is what determines whether to better decisions or just better conversations.

Listening gives you input.

Understanding gives you direction.

Because users don’t always tell you what the problem is.

But if you pay attention to how they behave, they’ll show you.

LET'S WORK TOGETHER

Ready to improve your product?

UX, research and product leadership for teams tackling complex digital services. The work usually starts where things have become harder than they need to be: unclear journeys, inconsistent products, competing priorities, or teams trying to move forward without a clear direction. I help simplify the problem, shape the right next step, and turn complexity into something people can actually use.

Previous feedback

Will Parkhouse

Senior Content Designer

01/20