Menu

AI

AI cannot fix bad strategy

AI can optimise, generate, and accelerate, but it cannot correct a product direction that was flawed from the start. It amplifies the strategy it is given.

Why AI only creates value when it is anchored to a clear direction, and why using it on top of weak strategy often makes the underlying problem harder to see.

28 September 20234 min read

In short

Why AI only creates value when it is anchored to a clear direction, and why using it on top of weak strategy often makes the underlying problem harder to see.

Why AI feels like progress even when direction is unclear

Most of the problems that show up in digital products aren't caused by poor execution. They sit much earlier: the wrong problem has been prioritised, the journey doesn't reflect how users actually behave, the structure doesn't support the task it's meant to enable. When that happens, no amount of will fix it. AI just makes it happen faster.

Reaching for it is also a way of avoiding a harder conversation. Rewriting the content is something a team can start on Monday. Establishing that the journey should not exist in its current form requires reopening a decision somebody senior already signed off, and that has no obvious first step.

The speed makes it more tempting still. produces visible movement within days, which buys time and looks like a . The underlying problem is unchanged, but the pressure to address it has been released.

AI does not rescue unclear thinking. It simply scales whatever direction the product is already moving in.

Why optimisation is not the same as effectiveness

Content can be improved, but if it's answering the wrong questions, it will still miss the mark. Journeys can be streamlined, but if they're built on incorrect assumptions, they will still create . can be refined, but if the underlying flow is flawed, the experience will still break down. Everything becomes more efficient. But not more effective.

The distinction shows up in what the metrics do. work moves things like and completion rate within the existing journey. Effectiveness work changes whether that journey was the right one, and it usually shows up somewhere else entirely, in , in support volume, or in revenue per visitor.

Key takeaway

If the problem has been framed badly, AI can improve the execution while leaving the real issue completely untouched.

Why AI can create a false sense of progress

AI is very good at making things look better. It can produce cleaner copy, more consistent structures, and more polished outputs. From the outside, it can look like the product has improved significantly. But underneath that, the same issues often remain. The hasn't changed. Metrics may shift slightly, may improve in places, and there's a sense that things are moving in the right direction. But the core problem is still there, just hidden behind better execution. That only holds for so long, because users don't respond to polish. They respond to relevance.

This is worth watching for in reporting. If output volume is rising, quality scores are rising, and the commercial numbers are flat, that combination is not a measurement problem waiting to resolve itself. It usually means the work is improving something that was never what stood in the way.

Why strategy has to come before AI

Before AI is introduced, before begins, before anything is generated, the direction needs to be clear. What problem is being solved? Why does it matter? How does the product support that in a way that makes sense for the user and the business? Without that , AI has nothing solid to work with.

Used properly, once the is right, AI can be incredibly effective. It can scale content, accelerate , and support in a way that would otherwise take significantly more time. When the direction is clear, AI becomes a multiplier. When the direction is wrong, it simply reinforces the problem, making it harder to recognise and more expensive to fix later. AI is not a safety net. It will not step in and identify that the wrong problem is being solved. That still requires human judgement. The temptation is to use AI to improve what exists. The reality is that sometimes what exists needs to be challenged first.

A useful gate before any of it starts: name the decision the user is trying to make, and what they need in order to make it confidently. If that cannot be answered without referring to the current design, the work has not been done and no amount of generation will substitute for it.

Written by Andy Scott

Strategic design, UX and digital transformation thinking from real projects.

LET'S WORK TOGETHER

Ready to improve your product?

UX, research and product leadership for teams tackling complex digital services.

Previous feedback

I had a fantastic experience working with Andy. One of his most impressive achievements during our time at NHS HEE was masterminding a deeply complex information architecture for a new platform that brought together a large number of legacy websites.

Will Parkhouse

Senior Content Designer