Menu

Content

Content Audit

A practical UX and content strategy method for assessing content quality, relevance, and consistency across a product or website.

How to run a content audit to identify gaps, remove redundancy, and prioritise updates that improve usability and outcomes.

4 min read

What it is

A is a UX and method used to evaluate all content in a product or website.

It involves reviewing text, images, videos, and other media for quality, accuracy, relevance, and with goals.

Audits identify gaps, redundancies, outdated content, and areas needing .

The focus is on improving content effectiveness, , and .

The goal is to ensure content meets user needs and supports .

A content audit turns content sprawl into a clear plan for improvement.

When to use it

Use this method when you need to assess and improve content.

It is most useful when:

content has grown organically and inconsistently
you are redesigning or updating a site or product
you want to improve usability and engagement
compliance or brand consistency is needed
you are preparing for SEO or accessibility improvements

It is less useful when:

the product is new and content is limited
there is no plan to act on findings
Content audits are often used before redesigns, SEO work, or UX optimisation.

Key takeaway

Run a content audit before major content decisions so priorities are evidence-based.

How to run it

Set up properly

Be clear on the scope, the criteria you are assessing against, and how findings will be recorded before you look at a single page. An audit without criteria becomes a very long opinion.

Include every content type and source, including PDFs, emails, help articles and error messages. The content that fails users is rarely the content on the main pages.

Run the method

are systematic and evaluative. The discipline is in assessing everything the same way, which is also what makes them tedious and what makes them credible.

  1. Inventory the content first. You cannot audit what you have not counted, and the count itself is usually the first surprise.
  2. Evaluate each item against stated criteria (accuracy, , relevance, tone, ), recording a judgement rather than a note.
  3. Identify gaps, redundancies and outdated material, keeping the three separate. They need different decisions and different owners.
  4. Categorise every item for action: keep, update, consolidate or delete. An audit that ends without a verdict per item has not finished.
  5. Document findings for in terms of risk and effort, not volume. Nobody acts on a spreadsheet of four thousand rows.

Focus on actionable rather than cataloguing. The inventory is the input; the decisions are the deliverable.

Capture and make sense of it

The value comes from a clear picture of content health. After auditing, document:

  • The findings that change what somebody should do next
  • Updates prioritised by impact against effort
  • A plan, or the same problems return within a year
  • A way to track progress, since audits are useless if repeated from scratch

Use this to improve and UX. The hardest part is not the audit but the deletion it recommends.

What to look for

Focus on:

Accuracy: is content correct and up to date
Relevance: does it meet user and business needs
Consistency: tone, style, terminology
Verdict coverage: whether every item has a keep, update or delete
Gaps: missing or incomplete content

Where it goes wrong

Most issues come from:

If findings aren’t acted on, the audit fails.

Auditing a sample and generalising to content you never opened
Applying criteria inconsistently, so the ranking reflects who assessed what
Scoring content against internal goals and never against a user need
Producing a spreadsheet with no verdict attached to any row
Counting pages rather than judging whether they earn their place

What you get from it

Done properly, this method gives you:

An evidenced picture of what you have and how much of it works
A keep, update, consolidate or delete decision on every item
Priorities weighted by traffic and consequence rather than by age
The basis for governance, so the same audit is not needed next year

Key takeaway

It helps you create content that supports both users and business goals.

Get in touch

If this sounds like something you need, we can run a content audit and help you organise, optimise, and improve your product’s content effectively.

No guesswork. No assumptions. Just content that works for users.

FAQ

Common questions

A few practical answers to the questions that usually come up around this method.

What is a content audit in UX?

It is a method for evaluating all content to identify gaps, redundancies, and optimisation opportunities.

When should you run a content audit?

Before redesigns, major updates, or optimisation work.

What can you assess?

Pages, text, media, labels, help content, and more.

What does an audit tell you that a look around does not?

It ensures content meets user needs and business objectives.

Does a content audit improve UX?

Yes. Clear, relevant content enhances usability and engagement.

Quick take

If your content is messy, outdated, or inconsistent, a content audit shows you what’s working and what isn’t.

LET'S WORK TOGETHER

Ready to improve your product?

UX, research and product leadership for teams tackling complex digital services.

Previous feedback

I had a fantastic experience working with Andy. One of his most impressive achievements during our time at NHS HEE was masterminding a deeply complex information architecture for a new platform that brought together a large number of legacy websites.

Will Parkhouse

Senior Content Designer