Menu

UR

Expert Interviews

A practical discovery method for bringing specialist knowledge, patterns, and risks into a project early.

How to use expert interviews to build understanding quickly in complex domains, uncover risks, and avoid solving the wrong problem.

4 min read

What it is

Expert interviews are a method used to gather from people with specialist knowledge in a specific domain, industry, or subject area.

They are used in UX and to quickly understanding where internal knowledge is limited.

Unlike , experts are not representing typical . They provide , patterns, risks, and informed perspectives based on experience.

The goal is to accelerate understanding, reduce blind spots, and avoid solving the wrong problem.

Expert interviews help you build understanding quickly, but they should inform direction rather than stand in for users.

When to use it

Use this method when you need informed rather than direct .

It is most useful when:

You are entering a new domain or industry
The product involves complex systems, regulations, or specialist knowledge
You need to understand industry standards or best practices
Internal knowledge is limited or fragmented
You want to validate or challenge early assumptions

It is less useful when:

You need to understand actual user behaviour
The domain is simple or well understood
You rely on experts to represent users
Expert interviews are often used alongside user interviews and secondary research to build a balanced view.

Key takeaway

Use expert interviews to build context quickly, especially when complexity, regulation, or specialist knowledge shapes the problem.

How to run it

Set up properly

Be clear on what you need to learn about the domain, what kind of expert can tell you, and how their expertise maps to your problem. Domain expertise and are different things.

Do the background reading first. Expert time is expensive and easily spent on things you could have looked up.

Run the method

Expert interviews buy speed. They compress months of domain learning into hours, which matters most in regulated, technical or specialist spaces where being wrong is costly.

  1. Start with their background, so you can weight what follows. An expert in the regulation is not an expert in how practitioners actually work around it.
  2. Explore how the domain works in practice rather than in principle. The gap between the two is usually where the design opportunity is.
  3. Ask about , risks and common failure modes. Experts are unusually good at naming what typically goes wrong.
  4. Probe for real examples. A concrete case is worth more than a general principle and is harder to mis-transfer.
  5. Challenge assumptions where you need to, politely. Experts are used to being deferred to, and deference produces a tidy but incomplete picture.

Remember that an expert is not a user. They know the domain deeply and often no longer see what a newcomer finds impossible.

Capture and make sense of it

The value comes from rapid domain understanding. After the interviews, document:

  • How the domain works in practice, including the informal parts
  • Risks, and regulatory limits that shape what is possible
  • Common failure modes worth designing against
  • Questions that still need answering with actual users

Use this to get competent quickly, then test with users. Expert sets the questions; it does not answer them.

What to look for

Focus on:

Patterns and norms: what consistently happens in the domain
Risks and edge cases: where things break or fail
Constraints: legal, technical, or operational limitations
Mental models: how experts structure and understand the space
Gaps in your knowledge: what you did not know to ask

Where it goes wrong

Most issues come from:

Experts provide guidance, not ground truth.

Treating domain expertise as user experience, which are different things
Relying on one expert, whose view of the field is still a view
Deferring throughout, which produces a tidy and incomplete picture
Learning how the domain is supposed to work rather than how it does
Ignoring where two experts disagree, which is usually the interesting part

What you get from it

Done properly, this method gives you:

Months of domain learning compressed into hours
The risks and constraints that shape what is buildable
Common failure modes worth designing against
Better questions to put to actual users

Key takeaway

It helps you move faster without making avoidable mistakes.

Get in touch

If this sounds like something you need, we can help you get up to speed quickly and make informed decisions from the start.

No guesswork. No assumptions. Just clear direction you can act on.

FAQ

Common questions

A few practical answers to the questions that usually come up around this method.

What are expert interviews in UX?

Expert interviews are a research method used to gather insight from people with specialist knowledge in a domain relevant to a product or service.

When should you use expert interviews?

Use them when entering a new domain, dealing with complex systems, or when you need informed context quickly.

What is the difference between expert interviews and user interviews?

Expert interviews provide domain knowledge and context, while user interviews focus on real user behaviour and experiences.

How many expert interviews do you need?

Usually 3 to 6 experts are enough to identify strong patterns, depending on the complexity of the domain.

Can expert interviews replace user research?

No. They provide context and guidance, but they do not reflect actual user behaviour.

Quick take

If you need deep domain knowledge quickly, speak to people who already understand the space.

Related Services

LET'S WORK TOGETHER

Ready to improve your product?

UX, research and product leadership for teams tackling complex digital services.

Previous feedback

I had a fantastic experience working with Andy. One of his most impressive achievements during our time at NHS HEE was masterminding a deeply complex information architecture for a new platform that brought together a large number of legacy websites.

Will Parkhouse

Senior Content Designer